| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Tue May 26, 2020 2:30 am |
|
All times are UTC [ DST ] |
|
Page 2 of 3 |
[ 45 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Blaze vs Bruce
Blaze vs Bruce
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Space Ranger   Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:31 pm Posts: 1416 
|
 Re: Blaze vs BruceBruce, by a long long long long loooooonnnnngggggg way.
Blaze's stuff ranges from bad to downright awful. I don't understand the love for Wolfsbane: They were dreadful. _________________ 
|
| Sun Sep 08, 2013 7:00 pm |
|
|
|
|
Super Trooper  Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:46 pm Posts: 9948
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce I would rather listen to Bruce solo. Then Samson, only heard Head Tactics, not that bad.
|
| Sun Sep 08, 2013 7:26 pm |
|
|
|
|
Climate Control   Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:54 pm Posts: 6333
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce I have a massive soft spot for wolsbane after i roadied for them in 1992, great guys, loves the first album and the kathy wilson EP loads.
_________________ Mo Mo Gaddafi wrote: His massive cock pleasured me immensely. |
| Sun Sep 08, 2013 7:32 pm |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper   Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 pm Posts: 17647 Location: Shakespeare Cuntry
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Bruce's solo stuff by a mile.
_________________ 
|
| Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:54 pm |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper  Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:23 pm Posts: 21990
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Samson need to be filed next to Flotsam and Jetsam in the 'bands-nobody-would-give-a-fuck-about-if-they-hadn't-produced-a-really-successful-musician-that-went-on-to-far-better-things' category.
_________________ 
|
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:10 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper  Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:28 am Posts: 20765 Location: Éire
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Horseshit.
|
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:11 am |
|
|
|
|
Climate Control Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:54 pm Posts: 6333
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce The Wretch wrote: Horseshit. Their first album is good. _________________ Mo Mo Gaddafi wrote: His massive cock pleasured me immensely. |
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:43 am |
|
|
|
|
Fluffy Bunny Rabbit  Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 1:08 am Posts: 263
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Bruce for Accident Of Birth and Chemical Wedding. Though I do love some of Blaze's solo stuff.
|
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:48 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:23 pm Posts: 21990
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Blaze's solo work is intense and personal in a way that Bruce's isn't. However, the 'personal' is what gets Blaze into trouble on many occasions.
Either way, nothing he released compares to 'Chemical Wedding', but i'd say a few of his solo albums are just as good as Accident, and they are better than the rest of Dicko's albums. I'd rather listen to King Of Metal than Skunkworks. _________________
|
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:12 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper  Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:54 pm Posts: 11256
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce I like Skunkworks.
It was also a sensible move for that period of time, trying something a bit new rather than just doing metal at a point when that genre was floundering. Unfortunately Bruce just has a distinctive metal voice, so he couldn't really go 'just rock'. I thought Accident was a bit cheesy at the time as he'd moved into some interesting stuff, but with hindsight Accident and Chemical are some of his better solo stuff. I'm a total Bruce fan-boy though, so I like all his solo stuff, even the terrible first one. _________________ http://sabaziusdoom.wordpress.com/ http://seabastard.bandcamp.com/ turdy wrote: Great tits and slow as fuck doom are Cromwell's Raison d'être. |
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:55 am |
|
|
|
|
Space Ranger  Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 7:44 pm Posts: 2247
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Cromwell wrote: I like Skunkworks. It was also a sensible move for that period of time, trying something a bit new rather than just doing metal at a point when that genre was floundering. Unfortunately Bruce just has a distinctive metal voice, so he couldn't really go 'just rock'. I thought Accident was a bit cheesy at the time as he'd moved into some interesting stuff, but with hindsight Accident and Chemical are some of his better solo stuff. I'm a total Bruce fan-boy though, so I like all his solo stuff, even the terrible first one. Seconded. Chemical Wedding is 5 fists and one of the best metal albums of the late 90's. |
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:45 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:28 am Posts: 20765 Location: Éire
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Dr Yail Bloor wrote: The Wretch wrote: Horseshit. Their first album is good. Who, Flotsam And Jetsam or Samson? The first Flotsam is great, as are the first four Samson. |
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:53 am |
|
|
|
|
Lifer, Deather, Hesher, Whatever.  Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:19 pm Posts: 550 Location: ESSEX
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce The Wretch wrote: Dr Yail Bloor wrote: The Wretch wrote: Horseshit. Their first album is good. Who, Flotsam And Jetsam or Samson? The first Flotsam is great, as are the first four Samson. The first two are great more like-in fact i think i prefer No Place For Disgrace.Everything after is 3 fists at best.Flotsam and Annihilator are the most consistently disappointing bands of the last 20 years-when you consider how brilliant both bands' first two records are. |
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:48 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 pm Posts: 17647 Location: Shakespeare Cuntry
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce mathewxentrix88 wrote: Flotsam and Annihilator are the most consistently disappointing bands of the last 20 years-when you consider how brilliant both bands' first two records are. _________________
|
| Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
Climate Control  Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 9:02 pm Posts: 45015 Location: Béal Átha na Slua
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Fucking hell. _________________ http://cow.org/csi/ |
| Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:22 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:23 pm Posts: 21990
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce His new album has been very well received overall though.
I lost touch with Blaze after King of Metal. _________________
|
| Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:51 pm |
|
|
|
|
Super Trooper  Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:29 am Posts: 7904
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Solaris wrote: Samson. I've heard bits & pieces of Wolfsbane (and saw them live, supporting Maiden in 1990) and they were OK. Haven't heard any Blaze solo stuff, the Bruce solo stuff I have heard didn't do anything for me (Tattooed Millionaire (1/5) & The Chemical Wedding (2/5)) but anything I've heard by Samson was pretty good. You think CW is 2/5? |
| Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
Climate Control Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 9:02 pm Posts: 45015 Location: Béal Átha na Slua
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce I haven't heard it since then but probably, yeah. It did nothing for me.
_________________ http://cow.org/csi/ |
| Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:40 pm |
|
|
|
|
Super Trooper Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:29 am Posts: 7904
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Solaris wrote: I haven't heard it since then but probably, yeah. It did nothing for me. Give it another crack.....it’s superb |
| Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:39 am |
|
|
|
|
Storm Trooper Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:23 pm Posts: 21990
|
Re: Blaze vs Bruce Chemical is a 2 yet Brave New World is a 5.
Yeh ok  _________________
|
| Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:29 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
[ 45 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
|
All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |