www.Terrorizer.com
http://forum.terrorizer.com/

#222: Huntress Article
http://forum.terrorizer.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4349
Page 2 of 5

Author:  robitusson [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

What's a hesher? And if she's ex-Playboy, why are there no pics of her norks in this thread?

Author:  Ed Blackadder [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Regardless of the articles, I actually laughed out loud at the header, "Terrorizer spends an evening with the lovely and talented Jill Janus..." which is very close to "She is good and lovely. She has the ability" (which I hope is a reference Tom will get even if no-one else does).

Rob:
Image

Image

Happy?

Author:  Ed Blackadder [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Oh, and I'm surprised no-one's called her out on being a poseur yet, given her old job as a SUPERCOOL club DJ (DJ Tuesdae).

Image

Stay classy!

Author:  hj864 [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Regardless of the whole sexploitation thing, the song is OK, I preferred that the 3IOB, who were shite. Her vocals are fine as well, the scream at the beginning is more extreme than I was expecting, in a good way.

Author:  Shallowthing [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Obviously but apparently still-effective marketing strategy cynically designed to sell a bland sub-Three Inches of Blood melodic metal band to the the "HURR HURR TITTIES" brigade. It's working too, judging by this thread. They sound fuck all like Megadeth though, Steev.

She's quite pretty, though. I'd do her if she promised not to sing or express any opinions about music, even though I'm not keen on the huge comedy (and presumably fake) breasts.

Author:  robitusson [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Ed Blackadder wrote:

Happy?

hmmm... Plain, but blonde with massive jugs. Nothing wrong with a selling point I suppose.

Author:  Mali [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Shakin' steev-unz wrote:
Google tells me the kangaroo one is called 'Matilda' (I could have guessed, really)



Um, I'm wrong in not hating this, aren't I? It's like if Megadeth still liked metal and had someone who could vaguely sing fronting them. A lot more "metal" than I was expecting. I was expecting a lame slightly heavier Ghost type-thing.

On reflection, won't download, it's pretty standard stuff and it's not great, but, yeah didn't hate it.

Her arms are too skinny. I still would though.


I wanted to hate it, but it's actually not bad... just very very average. But at least she can sing a bit... and I don't fancy her before you say anything.

Author:  Mali [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Morf wrote:
Not until you've seen her gaped anus at least. Keep your standards up, Mali!


Hmm, yes well... hahaha, I dunno. I have nothing against women playing metal of any sort, in fact I like a lot of bands with female singers... but it's a bit like comedy, comedy and music don't mix well, so if I see a band being funny I tend to think they are probably shit (Lich King for instance) and the same goes for women who try so hard to be 'sexy', getting their tits out and shit. I mean in all honesty it works, would that band have got a spread in Tez and MH based solely on their music? I think not.

Quote:
It's really really average.


Yes, it is, but it's not shit. And it's a lot better than I thought it would be. Remember that last months sack of shit tits-oot band, whose name I can't even remember, with the black girl who didn't really look very black.

Author:  Painkiller [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

TheFirstLastborn wrote:
I wanted to hate it, but it's actually not bad... just very very average. But at least she can sing a bit... and I don't fancy her before you say anything.


Yeah, that's pretty much it. I don't hate it, but it's impossible to be excited about it, and I can't imagine choosing to listen to it if other things are available. I really don't like the vocals either - I like vocals either soaring and triumphant or aggressive and shouty, I get annoyed when they try to be both.

Author:  Ed Blackadder [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

TheFirstLastborn wrote:

Hmm, yes well... hahaha, I dunno. I have nothing against women playing metal of any sort, in fact I like a lot of bands with female singers... but it's a bit like comedy, comedy and music don't mix well, so if I see a band being funny I tend to think they are probably shit (Lich King for instance) and the same goes for women who try so hard to be 'sexy', getting their tits out and shit. I mean in all honesty it works, would that band have got a spread in Tez and MH based solely on their music? I think not.

Don't you like Lacuna Coil?

The song on this month's Terrorizer CD is better than that Youtube video.

Author:  Stat_Rad [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

i picked up issue 222 today, first T i've picked up in a while, and it was a fucking rip off! I can only get the mag from two places now, and it's just too goddamn expensive here! plus there isn't much content anymore.

Author:  robitusson [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Mali wrote:


Just watched it now. Poor really. :( Has that shitty wumpa-wumpa plastic production sound. Like a shittier Hell or Onslaught maybe. Her jabbs are watchable though. 2 fists.

Author:  Annihislater [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

It amused me that after all the coverage Huntress have been getting lately in the magazine, that their album only got given a 1/5.

Author:  robitusson [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Tragic has a new user name or it's a spambot?

Author:  doomovertheworld [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

robitusson wrote:
Tragic has a new user name or it's a spambot?


i suspect the latter

Mali wrote:


just watched it. my poor ears there is a six minute of my life that i won't get back :(

Author:  Termoid [ Thu May 03, 2012 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Huntress are a shit gimmick band but the vocalist is fit.

Case closed.

Author:  hj864 [ Thu May 03, 2012 10:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Termoid wrote:
Huntress are a shit gimmick band but the vocalist is fit.

Case closed.


Like Entwined?

Author:  Michael Easton [ Thu May 03, 2012 10:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Morf wrote:
Have you seen how much that guy can leg press?


Tom can do more.

Author:  Green Man [ Fri May 04, 2012 1:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

I love the article!!! And I love all that stuff about dancing naked in the forest. Metal needs more chicks dancing naked in forests!

Job done. It's entertaining and I'm interested. I hope to see lots more of this band.

Author:  Green Man [ Fri May 04, 2012 2:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: #222: Huntress Article

Morf wrote:
How old are you?


Why? You looking for a date? ;)

Page 2 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/