Who said anything about the pictures not being sexual?

Since when was a picture of a nude woman not sexual?

This topic is getting way out of control and you guys are obsessing too much over a few 'nude in public' pics I posted in the last thread. What did I post in this thread - Alison Angel. What's so "non-sexual" about that?

Again, you're making too much out of it. So what, I posted a few ENF pics? I've also posted pics of Elena Marie, Alison Angel, Anna Taverner.

So what I don't like porn? So I prefer the sight of a nude woman over the sight of some dude's cock.

Get over it already and use this thread for what it's for - pictures of hot women. I already told Morf that I'll try to post women that are more traditionally accepted as attractive.

In the last thread I posted some pics of women with bad hairdos. That's because I was trying to do a theme of 80's women and had slim pickings from Google. Forget about the last thread and move on.

PS. I never said I was into real ENF. It's much more sensual that the woman is posing for the picture and is getting some enjoyment out of her exibitionism.

I don't click on the glass dildo thread for a reason.

Right now. Can we get back on topic?

I liked this thread more when Green Man didn't talk to himself for five posts at a time.

Shut up, you!



Just for that:

Rawkstar used to do that, with even less coherence.

I'm probably the odd one out here, but I quite like Green Mans posts in this thread. The ladies all look natural.

I don't see any stretch marks, just some tracks where she was probably wearing tight clothing.

I love seeing the word "Image" over and over again too.

Me too. Who knew Firefox had a shit PG-rated "porn" blocker?

Some people just like to complain for the sake of complaining.

Think you can post better looking women? Then get to it.

I agree, pictures of exclusively feet are a bit shit and certainly not hot or sexy. But then how often is it just a foot? Most feet fetish stuff I've seen has been very sexual and the feet are a part of an already evocative pose.

I don't doubt there is a big demand, nor do I have a problem with it. Each to their own, whatever floats your boat/lights your candle/rings your bell etc. I was just trying to offer a suggestion of why people think your tastes are so strange.

So you either didn't read what I wrote, ignored it or didn't understand. OK.

A picture of a person or body part being shown as 'sexualised' or 'eroticised' is not the same as whether or not you (or anyone else) finds it a turn-on. That's what I was trying to say. Also, you can quite easily see a picture of a naked woman and not find it sexual. Imagine the famous Vietnam war photo of children running and screaming, but with a woman instead a girl. Would that be sexy?

Only because Green Man keeps posting them everywhere.

NO.



Look, I'm not trying to ignore you. I'm just tired of having to defend myself. This ENF thing is not about being sick or perverted. It's just the difference between a stripper (who's stripped countless times before) and a woman stripping for the first time and being shy about it.

I just think people are over-analysing this. I don't know if you're joking or you're serious anymore.

It wasn't that funny the first time. Now you're just repeating the same joke over and over again.




C'mon, is Alison Angel and Veronica Zemonova really that unattractive?

Ed's previous comment that you don't seem to realise you can use the internet to look at girls prettier than you can pull in real life still stands, Green, but I'm with you on the Alison Angel thing.