www.Terrorizer.com - View topic - Objectifying Human Beings Is Bad Thread (NSFW)
TERRORIZER FRONT PAGE
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:04 pm



Reply to topic  [ 1650 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 83  Next
 Objectifying Human Beings Is Bad Thread (NSFW) 
Author Message
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Ed Blackadder wrote:
Green Man wrote:

Pictures of feet seem tame to those who don't have a foot fetish, so I'm not sure what your point is.

That's not true. If you look at the feet photos Fhil posted a few pages back, they're obviously meant to be sexualised, from the way the photo is taken and so on. I don't get anything sexy out of feet, but even so, looking at those photos you can tell they're meant for wanking - they're not just photos of someone who's slipped their shoes off. The photos you post, by and large, seem not to be overtly sexualised in the same way, despite featuring more nudity or 'obviously' sexy body parts. Does that make sense?


Who said anything about the pictures not being sexual?

Since when was a picture of a nude woman not sexual?

This topic is getting way out of control and you guys are obsessing too much over a few 'nude in public' pics I posted in the last thread. What did I post in this thread - Alison Angel. What's so "non-sexual" about that?

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Shallowthing wrote:
I think it's a bit sinister that the embarrassment of the young lady seems to be an important part of this for Green.

Anni's right about the aspect of tameness, though. Green seems like the popular conception of a stuffy Victorian, who'd allegedly blow his load at the sight of a well-turned ankle.


Again, you're making too much out of it. So what, I posted a few ENF pics? I've also posted pics of Elena Marie, Alison Angel, Anna Taverner.

So what I don't like porn? So I prefer the sight of a nude woman over the sight of some dude's cock.

Get over it already and use this thread for what it's for - pictures of hot women. I already told Morf that I'll try to post women that are more traditionally accepted as attractive.

In the last thread I posted some pics of women with bad hairdos. That's because I was trying to do a theme of 80's women and had slim pickings from Google. Forget about the last thread and move on.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:18 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
PS. I never said I was into real ENF. It's much more sensual that the woman is posing for the picture and is getting some enjoyment out of her exibitionism.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:22 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Seer wrote:
bás wrote:
You have to think like a man for a minute Seer. Pretend you have a willy and you got a semi just from looking at that picture, then you'll understand our lusty ways.


No chance, mate. If I was a man I'd be gay and proud. I don't fancy women's bodies. This was really crystallised when I was pissing around on those gay blogs looking for saggy ballsack GIFs to share with Terrorizer. I wince when I see a dick going in to a woman and feel absolutely fine when I see them going in to men. Not turned on or anything, but just not covering my eyes and getting butt pains. I can't even look at tits. I was desensitised for a long time because of porn and libido.



I don't click on the glass dildo thread for a reason.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:25 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Right now. Can we get back on topic?


Image

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:27 pm
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 15990
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
I liked this thread more when Green Man didn't talk to himself for five posts at a time.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:28 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Shallowthing wrote:
I liked this thread more when Green Man didn't talk to himself for five posts at a time.


Shut up, you! :lol:



Just for that:


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:15 pm
Profile
Darth Fucking Vader
Darth Fucking Vader

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 25945
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Shallowthing wrote:
I liked this thread more when Green Man didn't talk to himself for five posts at a time.


Rawkstar used to do that, with even less coherence.


Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:17 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Image

Image

Image

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:19 pm
Profile
Super Trooper
Super Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:42 am
Posts: 9886
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
I'm probably the odd one out here, but I quite like Green Mans posts in this thread. The ladies all look natural.


Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:21 pm
Profile
Super Trooper
Super Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:42 am
Posts: 9886
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
I don't see any stretch marks, just some tracks where she was probably wearing tight clothing.


Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:43 pm
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 15990
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
bás wrote:
I quite like Green Mans posts in this thread.

I love seeing the word "Image" over and over again too.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:12 pm
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 15990
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Me too. Who knew Firefox had a shit PG-rated "porn" blocker?

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:19 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Some people just like to complain for the sake of complaining.

Think you can post better looking women? Then get to it.

_________________
Image


Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:51 pm
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:18 pm
Posts: 13074
Location: Leigh
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Green Man wrote:
Annihislater wrote:
Green Man wrote:
There's far stranger fancies out there than liking the idea of a shy woman losing a strip game, having her clothes ripped off by a group of girls, then made to walk around nude in public.

There are, but certainly for me the issue (and don't take this as an insult as I don't know how else to word it) is that it just seems far too tame to really be taken seriously as fetish. And I get that fetishes don't have to be extreme, but the sort of images you post just seem really bland in the grand scheme, even unsexual, which I would have thought a bad thing (unless it isn't something sexual, in which case apologies for misunderstanding.)


Pictures of feet seem tame to those who don't have a foot fetish, so I'm not sure what your point is.


I'm open to discussion but really I don't think it's a big deal. If you do a Google search on any of those that I mentioned you'll see that there's already a large demand for that stuff so I don't understand why people find it so weird.

As for pictures that I've posted, they may not be online right now, but there's been Tez users who have approved of many of them. It's been hit or miss. Mostly it's just whether or not people find the same ladies attractive, whether they're nude in public or in a studio is irrelevant.


I agree, pictures of exclusively feet are a bit shit and certainly not hot or sexy. But then how often is it just a foot? Most feet fetish stuff I've seen has been very sexual and the feet are a part of an already evocative pose.

I don't doubt there is a big demand, nor do I have a problem with it. Each to their own, whatever floats your boat/lights your candle/rings your bell etc. I was just trying to offer a suggestion of why people think your tastes are so strange.

_________________
Last.fm


Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:01 am
Profile WWW
Super Trooper
Super Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:32 pm
Posts: 8683
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Green Man wrote:
Ed Blackadder wrote:
Green Man wrote:

Pictures of feet seem tame to those who don't have a foot fetish, so I'm not sure what your point is.

That's not true. If you look at the feet photos Fhil posted a few pages back, they're obviously meant to be sexualised, from the way the photo is taken and so on. I don't get anything sexy out of feet, but even so, looking at those photos you can tell they're meant for wanking - they're not just photos of someone who's slipped their shoes off. The photos you post, by and large, seem not to be overtly sexualised in the same way, despite featuring more nudity or 'obviously' sexy body parts. Does that make sense?


Who said anything about the pictures not being sexual?

Since when was a picture of a nude woman not sexual?

This topic is getting way out of control and you guys are obsessing too much over a few 'nude in public' pics I posted in the last thread. What did I post in this thread - Alison Angel. What's so "non-sexual" about that?

So you either didn't read what I wrote, ignored it or didn't understand. OK.

A picture of a person or body part being shown as 'sexualised' or 'eroticised' is not the same as whether or not you (or anyone else) finds it a turn-on. That's what I was trying to say. Also, you can quite easily see a picture of a naked woman and not find it sexual. Imagine the famous Vietnam war photo of children running and screaming, but with a woman instead a girl. Would that be sexy?

_________________
Guardian-reading Fairtrade coffee-drinking bollocks


Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:17 am
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 15990
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Ed Blackadder wrote:
you can quite easily see a picture of a naked woman and not find it sexual

Only because Green Man keeps posting them everywhere.

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:22 am
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Ed Blackadder wrote:
Imagine the famous Vietnam war photo of children running and screaming, but with a woman instead a girl. Would that be sexy?


NO.



Look, I'm not trying to ignore you. I'm just tired of having to defend myself. This ENF thing is not about being sick or perverted. It's just the difference between a stripper (who's stripped countless times before) and a woman stripping for the first time and being shy about it.

I just think people are over-analysing this. I don't know if you're joking or you're serious anymore.

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:09 pm
Profile
Star Trooper
Star Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 1:07 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Wherever I imagine myself to be
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Shallowthing wrote:
Ed Blackadder wrote:
you can quite easily see a picture of a naked woman and not find it sexual

Only because Green Man keeps posting them everywhere.


It wasn't that funny the first time. Now you're just repeating the same joke over and over again.




C'mon, is Alison Angel and Veronica Zemonova really that unattractive?

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:12 pm
Profile
Storm Trooper
Storm Trooper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 11256
Post Re: Admirers of males/females II (NWS): now nipplier
Ed's previous comment that you don't seem to realise you can use the internet to look at girls prettier than you can pull in real life still stands, Green, but I'm with you on the Alison Angel thing.

_________________
http://sabaziusdoom.wordpress.com/

http://seabastard.bandcamp.com/

turdy wrote:
Great tits and slow as fuck doom are Cromwell's Raison d'être.


Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:15 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 1650 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 83  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.