www.Terrorizer.com
http://forum.terrorizer.com/

The Iron Maiden thread
http://forum.terrorizer.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5433
Page 135 of 135

Author:  Cosmic Equilibrium [ Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

I've always loved the self-titled and rated it as a 5 fist album from day one.

Author:  Stat_Rad [ Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

It sounds like shit, but there is plenty of magic to it. Has a special atmosphere.

Author:  Cosmic Equilibrium [ Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

^ Exactly that.

My new updated Maiden ratings, based on some re-listenings:

1) AMOLAD 5
2) SIT 5
3) DOD 5
4) The X Factor 5
5) Iron Maiden 5
6) SSOASS 5
7) NOTB 5
8) Powerslave 5
9) FOTD 5
10) BNW 4
11) TFF 4
12) POM 4
13) NPFTD 3
14) TBOS 3
15) VXI 3
16) Killers 3

Just to note that you couldn't put a blade of grass in between the debut, 7th Son, NOTB, Powerslave or FOTD - those records are pretty much at the same level, so the preference order for that section is a bit meaningless.

Author:  Spiny Norman [ Sun Jan 28, 2018 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

*Sees Killers at the bottom*

Image

Author:  Solaris [ Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

It's a standard rule: CE is Wrong About Maiden. Look where The X Factor is, for fuck's sake.

Author:  Cosmic Equilibrium [ Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

I can't be that wrong about them if I gave all their 80s albums 5 fists apart from Killers and POM.

On the subject of Killers, I dug it out again the other week and gave it an objective listen. I still wouldn't give it more than 3.5 fists. The first two Maiden albums are comprised of the songs the band had been writing in the period before they were signed, for the most part, and it's very clear to me that they put nearly all of the strongest ones on the debut and with some exceptions (Wrathchild, title track) most of the lesser ones ended up on Killers. Now these songs aren't bad by any stretch of the imagination, but to me they sound more like B-side cuts than the prime meat put on the debut.

I'm sure Harris himself has mentioned this fact somewhere, but I will have to look it up. I think it was in the official biography of Maiden.

However, I will stick up for Prodigal Son, which is rather unusual compared to most of the other songs in that it is complete Jethro Tull worship - and it works really well.

Also, additional note - even the lesser Killers songs sound amazing when performed live by the band, as Beast Over Hammersmith demonstrates.

Author:  opaline [ Sun Feb 04, 2018 7:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

I agree that "Killers" is Maiden's weakest 80's album & would also give it a 3.5/5 rating but "Prodigal Son" was the only weak track on the album for mine. It simply stands out like a sore thumb & intrudes on an otherwise fairly focused tracklisting. The reason I rate "Killers" lower than other 80's albums though is primarily due to the lack of obvious highlight tracks. On paper I should like it much more than that the debut. I mean it's heavier, more progressive, the musicianship is improved, it's more consistent, it's got a more suitable production, etc... but I do think that the more expansive production has sucked a little bit of the life out of the guitars. They sound a bit washed out to me. "Killers" is a solid album but it doesn't reach the heights of Maiden's other 80's albums for mine. I still have a lot of time for it though.

Author:  FlockaJawaka [ Fri Sep 21, 2018 11:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Iron Maiden thread

I got this new work vehicle, and I got a few USB sticks with music all on em, all the folders are all named with the year of release before the album name. This one particular stick with like heavy modern music in the directory, first folder is Iron Maiden "Iron Maiden", once in a while the system just loses the last playpoint and goes to the start, so I've heard fucking "Prowler" about 3000 times recently.

I spend a lot of time driving and have a lot of time with my own thoughts... I thought about this, and that's some fucking weird lyrics right there. The line about "reeling around" cracks me up every time. I gather it's an ode to wanking in the bushes, peeping on girls and exposing yourself to them and what not.. But the imagery that "reeling" now conjures up for me, is like he's so horny and filthy, that he is a man performing the actions of angling, like he's trying to land some big fish, but holding his own dick and kind of slamming himself about by it in some self perpetuating sexual solo wrestling move to impress this woman outside her house. Like reeling himself in.

That's my silly imagination, but the most feasible intended implication seems to be that his wank is so powerful that he spazzes out on the floor, which might be even weirder.

Page 135 of 135 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/